Huge Election in Massachusettes Tuesday

[Anthony703]

Originally Posted by IndependentVoter

The only reason why that racist brown won is because the voters were too afraid of electing a woman.

And your proof that brown is a racist is... Careful the paradygm has changed, your usual tactic of trying to intimidate by spewing an assortment of unsupportable slur's, has gone by the wayside. And since when would the voters of an ultra blue state like mass, be afraid of a woman in any profession? More the likelyhood--that segment of the electorate that voted obama in, has now seen the true face of the incompetent left, has had second thoughts and now is willing to vote him/them--out.

[Bubba]

Brown won because the voters in Mass are complacent. How many years was Kennedy in? He probably had a couple uncontested elections. The Dems should have tried harder. They'll knock Brown out next time.

[Anthony703]

Originally Posted by Bubba

Brown won because the voters in Mass are complacent. How many years was Kennedy in? He probably had a couple uncontested elections. The Dems should have tried harder. They'll knock Brown out next time.

Shoulda, coulda, woulda--the mantra of the fringe. And your presupposing that brown will fall short of what the independent voters that put him in office want him to do. It is quite obvious that obama is now filling those shoes, so for brown to follow suit would mean that his stupidity is on par with that of obama. You do remember the joe wilson flap that you all threw when he called obama that well deserved liar appelation? Well--obama now returned the favor to the judiciary and for your earlier complaints to hold any water, your indignation on his transgression should, at the least, be equal to your complaints about joe wilson. But considering your pedigree--I am not holding my breath.

[rmr76]

Don't count your chickens before they hatch an Massachusetts Republican. He supports the brutal practice of infanticide. He supports a woman right to be murder there own children. We have Democrats with more compassion than that.

[Peri]

Originally Posted by rmr76

Don't count your chickens before they hatch an Massachusetts Republican. He supports the brutal practice of infanticide. He supports a woman right to be murder there own children. We have Democrats with more compassion than that.

I've never heard this man say he supports infanticide (and neither have you), but your larger point is right-on: he didn't win because he's a social conservative, rather because he's a "fiscal hawk" (his own words there).

He also didn't win because of his opposition to healthcare reform: Mass has good coverage of its citizens.

And he eschews the typical knee-jerk Republican talking points. I think the people of Mass made a good choice for their state.

[Anthony703]

Originally Posted by rmr76

Don't count your chickens before they hatch an Massachusetts Republican. He supports the brutal practice of infanticide. He supports a woman right to be murder there own children. We have Democrats with more compassion than that.

Regardless of what any prefer--abortion is indeed a viable medical procedure that should be available to those that may actually need it for their own survival. It has only taken on its ghoulish characterization because the far left fringe wants to use it as some form of argument for womens rights. Take that procedure and apply it as the pro abortionists initially wanted at the beginning--rape, incest and the mothers life and all of those millions of convenience abortions would instead be a fraction of a fraction. The reality is that the vast majority of americans do not support the fringe desire for abortion on demand and the lefts tactic of using the courts to get what they want is clear indication that they know that as well as anyone else does.

[Anthony703]

Originally Posted by Peri

I've never heard this man say he supports infanticide (and neither have you), but your larger point is right-on: he didn't win because he's a social conservative, rather because he's a "fiscal hawk" (his own words there).

He also didn't win because of his opposition to healthcare reform: Mass has good coverage of its citizens.

And he eschews the typical knee-jerk Republican talking points. I think the people of Mass made a good choice for their state.

Keep it up--continuing to fantasize that the average guy in mass is as wacked out in their leftist proclivities as you. The intriguing detail about fiscal responsibilities is that it usuall translates into a fairly responsible view of most things social. Why is that--the fiscal always has to pay for the social and your views of social responsibilities are just flat too expensive. Brown was voted in for the same reasons as obama, the people are pi$$ed off at government at all levels. And why are the angry--obama is the poster child of government incompetence and arrogance. Internationally he is an absolute joke, his incompetence and arrogance there has turned everyone except cuba and venezuela off. And his domestic policies--more of the same hyper leftist view that everything can be blamed on bush and the republicans. A song that has grown completely stale as most rational people understand that with his super majorities in the legislature and his ongoing failures are his and the democrats alone.