Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba
Actually I think it would be quite successful. I'm sure the gov would actually use the existing medical carriers to administer a national plan.
Everyone makes a big deal about the fraud in some Medicare/Medicaid claims. Well it happens in all types of insurance. Every carrier has a large SIU unit that investigates insurance fraud. Every time I have some kind of procedure the insurance company follows up with a questionnaire to verify that what the doctor or hospital did was legitimate. When Medicaid does the same thing they are accused of wasting money on unneeded oversight.
The party of NO needs to get it together. Health care reform is just plain old common sense.
|
And the best response you can scrabble together--
you think it would be quite successful. One problem there sherlock--with the feds calling the shots, whatever administrator is administrating, means absolutely nothing. They dance to the tune that the fed want to play and since too many of those within the fed are hyper sensitive to pressures from the their lobbiest masters, the end result is always the same--bankruptcy. The best example--the post office--years ago a study on making the dept. solvent laid out some basic and specific reforms to make, which immediately ran up against the unions. And what resulted--nothing--the losing ways of the post office are still on a fast track and represents the mirror of every other fed program that is equally as shoddy and mismanaged.
And dismissing the fraud that is the norm within all industries completely ignores the fraud that
is the
federal government. Just remember--the master
himself even said he could eliminate half a trillion $ in fraud and waste in medicare alone. Couple his latest admission with the same fraud and waste in the irs, the post office, medicaid, the veterans admin.,the nea, hud, the dept. of education, the defense dept, the epa,
oh he-ll--
every single dept. within the federal government and there wouldn't be the need for obama to bankrupt the nation and break the back of the real taxpayers. But we all know that he gave 95% of the american people a tax cut last year--his own admission--again. Is that 95% of the 50% that actually do pay taxes or is it 95% of the 50% that don't, or if possible, is it--both?